Forums

Did Haringey not learn the lesson of Victoria Climbie?

Last post 23/01/10 at 22:26 by lilyinthefield, 44 replies
Post started by nomad on 11/11/08 at 17:53

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    1
    Posted by: nomad 11/11/2008 at 17:53
    Joined on 10/05/2002
    Posts 9,203

    In 2003, the Government published a green paper called Every Child Matters. This was published alongside the formal response to the report into the death of Victoria Climbie, the young girl who was horrifically abused and tortured, and eventually killed by her great aunt and the man with whom they lived.  The inquiry into her death cost £3.8m, making it the most expensive child protection investigation in British history.

    The green paper prompted an unprecedented debate about services for children, young people and families. There was a wide consultation with people working in children's services, and with parents, children and young people.

    Following the consultation major changes were made to child protection policies, including the formation of the Every Child Matters programme; the introduction of the Children Act 2004; the creation of the ContactPoint project, a planned government database that will hold information on all children in England and Wales; and the creation of the Office of the Children's Commissioner chaired by the Children's Commissioner.

    The whole process cost millions and has put into place a swathe of bureaucratic paperwork for schools, the police, health services and social services.  The CAF is a typical example.

    The Laming enquiry found many deficiencies in Haringey Council's dealings with the Climbie and other child abuse cases.  The inquiry heard how Haringey council failed to assign social workers to 109 children in May 1999, a short period before they took on Victoria's case.  It also heard how Haringey Council diverted £18.7m  in the two years 1997/98 and 1998/99, from its social services department into services such as education, for the purpose of gaining votes; and underspent their budget for children's services causing a deteriorating of child protection services.

    Haringey council wrote a letter to Laming claiming that social workers who gave evidence were being questioned more harshly than other witnesses. Laming condemned the letter, saying "I will not tolerate any covert attempt to influence the way in which the inquiry is conducted."

    The government placed Haringey Social Services Separtment under special measures, requiring close supervision by the social services inspectorate. Allegations emerged that in 2004 and 2005, senior managers at Haringey council ignored child abuse cases and "became hostile" against a social worker who sought to expose the abuse.

    So....... Why all that history?

    A 17-month-old boy, who was seen by social services 60 times in eight months, died after repeatedly being used "as a punchbag" and having his back broken. 

    The toddler - known as Baby P - suffered more than 50 injuries and was on the child protection register but was allowed to stay in the care of his mother, her boyfriend and their lodger.

    The police described the boyfriend as "sadistic - fascinated with pain" (he had Nazi memorabilia in the house) and the mother as "a slob, completely divorced from reality. She was living in a dream world and put her lover before her child. She closed her eyes to what was going on". 

    Last June police officers felt very strongly that the boy should not be returned to his mother.  A police inspector asked twice if the threshold had been reached to start care proceedings.  However, Gillie Christou, the idiot in charge of social workers looking after children on the register in the LA agreed to keep the baby with his mother.

    In court today, his 32-year-old "step-father" and lodger Jason Owen, 36, were convicted of causing or allowing Baby P's death, a charge already admitted by the child's 27-year-old mother.

     

     

     

     

     

    But here's the rub.  Guess which local authority's social services was in charge of the case?

     

    Haringey Council.

  • Offline
    2
    Posted by: crackerjack 11/11/2008 at 18:02
    Joined on 22/09/2004
    Posts 1,041

    Harigey was always "out there" when it came to social services, but I doubt the police do any better in the round.  Unfortunately I have my own experience of this when they failed to act in a matter.

    There are no easy solutions, but having well trained staff goes a long way. 

     

  • Offline
    3
    Posted by: Fire Girl 11/11/2008 at 18:06
    Joined on 25/09/2002
    Posts 1,636

    Heartbreaking and makes me ashamed to be part of the human race.

    That poor, poor child. O I do so hope that there is a heaven, because he's already experienced hell.

     

    What miserable failures we are.
  • Offline
    4
    Posted by: seren_dipity 11/11/2008 at 18:07
    Joined on 29/10/2005
    Posts 46,643

     Every time I read the article I cry again...

  • Offline
    5
    Posted by: Middlemarch 11/11/2008 at 18:10
    Joined on 09/09/2005
    Posts 16,563

     I've known a number of biological mothers whose children should not have been allowed to remain with them, but this scandalous policy - whereby social services determine that a child is 'better off' with its mother, despite all the evidence to the contrary - continues.

  • Offline
    6
    Posted by: Mo30 11/11/2008 at 18:12
    Joined on 05/11/2008
    Posts 516

    Social Services then fail to support the family. And do not give the Father any help, advice or information.

  • Offline
    7
    Posted by: modelmaker 11/11/2008 at 18:22
    Joined on 03/12/2005
    Posts 13,982

    nomad:
    The police described the boyfriend as "sadistic - fascinated with pain"

    I would hope once he's been banged up, his interest and awareness of pain will become even more acute. This isn't the thread for a discussion why, although it might well be an interesting one, but it's often said that many of those locked up have an intense and violent dislike to people that harm or abuse kids.
  • Offline
    8
    Posted by: crackerjack 11/11/2008 at 18:26
    Joined on 22/09/2004
    Posts 1,041

    You mean he'll be on the rule?  I don't think more  violence is necessarily the way forward.  Although it might be a common response.

  • Offline
    9
    Posted by: skybluelibrary 11/11/2008 at 18:41
    Joined on 08/03/2008
    Posts 22

    I left Haringey this summer.  Fortunately I worked with few children with circumstances that meant that social services were involved but I was astonished with the actions of social workers when I did have to work with them.  I pray to God that this will be the last time a case like this happens, but I have little confidence in Haringey's ability to change.

  • Offline
    10
    Posted by: harsh-but-fair 11/11/2008 at 18:42
    Joined on 24/03/2006
    Posts 29,223

    and now, guess what .......

     

    "A nationwide independent review of child protection services will be launched after two men were convicted over the death of a toddler who was on the at-risk register.

     

     

    Children's minister Beverley Hughes made the announcement after the pair were found guilty of causing or allowing the death of the youngster - known as Baby P for legal reasons."

     

     

    lessons will be learnt ...

    it will never happen again

    new procedures

    training

     

    blah,blah,blah ........

     

     

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums