|
Just discovered this thread which seems to have being going on for some time. Very emotive issues raised throughout. In agreement with a number of others, the question should be more about the skills and experience that PTPC (guidance teachers) can bring to the job and indeed if they fulfill any meaningful role in todays secondary schools, regardless of subject background. In my school the PTPCs consist of six £45k members, with three of these having less than five years teaching experience in their subject. I was recently present at a training course for potential PTs and more than half of the 15 or so people there professed to be heading in the pastoral care direction. (Some openly stated that PT curricular was far too much hard work and that PTPC would take them out of the classroom!!) Most of the group had less than 6 years of teaching experience! Pastoral Care is, to my mind, seen as an 'easy climb' by many young teachers, some of whom view it as a way out of the difficult enviroment of the classroom (I refer to the description given by one post of a typical PSE class 'Grange Hill' was mentioned! Perhaps due to the lack of classroom skills of the PSE teacher...) There are of course the others who entered the Pastoral Care team for the right reasons - with sound teaching and life experience and the best interests of the pupils - not the bank balance - at heart and I applaud them for the support and direction they give both the pupils and in making my job at the chalkface a little easier - just as the job of PTPC should. However, this breed are becoming less and less present, in favour of the 'bright, young, popular things' who can talk all the right teacher-speak in interviews and are bezzy mates with the kids. Incidentally, half of our SMT came through the Pastoral Care route as opposed to curricular route...
|