Forums

Diploma - "the qualification of choice"

Last post 28/10/09 at 14:34 by piggypiggy, 3 replies
Post started by McDiploma on 28/10/09 at 12:31

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    1
    Posted by: McDiploma 28/10/2009 at 12:31
    Joined on 19/04/2008
    Posts 567

    "The Children's Secretary Ed Balls has said he hopes the Diploma, which combines theoretical and practical learning, will become the qualification of choice." from

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8328510.stm 

    This is yet another subject / topic that Labour are in denial about. This lack of honesty about their failings is why I won't be voting for them in a few months. Balls needs to get real and get a grip.

  • Offline
    2
    Posted by: violetriga 28/10/2009 at 12:55
    Joined on 06/05/2007
    Posts 518

    Shadow Children's Secretary Michael Gove said: "Ed Balls boasted that his new Diploma was on course to overtake the A-level and become the qualification of choice for young people.

    "But universities aren't impressed, teachers are confused and students have shunned the course."

     

  • Offline
    3
    Posted by: HelenLou 28/10/2009 at 13:22
    Joined on 02/12/2002
    Posts 1,143
    God this makes me mad! Fine, pedal these qualifications if you must but be honest with kids. Do not tell them they are equivalent to anything else and will open all doors when they won't. I know for a fact the medical faculty where my husband works (including medicine and dentistry) at a fairly well regarded University will not look at kids with diplomas and I bet they arent the only ones either! If kids want to do them, then fine, but they need to know which doors will shut when they opt for a diploma. Its no good taking them, then finding out half way through Y12 that they won't be able to go on to the HE course they want. Im fed up with the government lying about this. We had 2 women from DCSF come to 'promote' these diplomas to our school and I asked them then were all universities and all courses on board, they said yes and got quite stroppy with me when I said I didn't think this was the case. So I did my own digging and low and behold I was right! grrrrrr
  • Offline
    4
    Posted by: piggypiggy 28/10/2009 at 14:34
    Joined on 17/10/2004
    Posts 456

    Whilst I am sure that one or two kids who are bright enough, select Diplomas rather than A Levels, it too makes me very angry that they are being peddled as some kind of equivalent qualification to them. The diplomas are the one you direct your weak kids too, who couldn't handle A Levels. To call them 'vocational' is a joke - they do very little 'doing' stuff in most of them and lots of 'talking about doing' instead. Why? Because schools don't have the facilities to deliver the practical aspects. Nor do they have the time. Nor do they have the will to track and coordinate what kids do across half a dozen schools and colleges (which Dick thought that delivering a qualification by bussing kids all over the county was a great idea)?

    I would love to know:

    a) How many kids this year went to Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, Warwick, Bath for example, to do a degree solely on the basis of having a Diploma in Muppet Studies or something similar.

    b) How Balls got his job.

    c) How he hasn't been sacked for the SATS fiasco, the Student Loans fiasco, the Diploma and Functional Skills fiascos, the ICT KS3 tests online fiasco etc etc. How can someone with so many failures under his belt keep getting away with blaming others and initiating enquiries?

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums