Forums

Only 150 of the 2000+ schools who registered actually want to become an academy..

Last post 31/07/10 at 15:19 by 1dioch, 33 replies
Post started by clumsy1974 on 29/07/10 at 13:40

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    1
    Posted by: clumsy1974 29/07/2010 at 13:40
    Joined on 13/01/2010
    Posts 444

    So I ask again.. why the rush? Less than 10% of those listed as being interested actually were. The website required people to put in their school details, which I assume is what then meant they were included in Gove's numbers. Now the real total is out, and at most 50 of these are believed to be able to convert by September. This seems to suggest that more time could of been taken, and more thought put into the bill..

    Let hope that this smattering of schools do not cost the majority dearly in their own haste..

  • Offline
    2
    Posted by: curlygirly 29/07/2010 at 13:51
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 9,659
    Acadamise in haste, repent at leisure ( or something like that!)
  • Offline
    3
    Posted by: greenster 29/07/2010 at 13:53
    Joined on 07/05/2006
    Posts 9,520

    Well now there is a surprise - not.

  • Offline
    4
    Posted by: Middlemarch 29/07/2010 at 13:57
    Joined on 09/09/2005
    Posts 16,677

     Does anyone have a link for this story/information?

  • Offline
    5
    Posted by: harsh-but-fair 29/07/2010 at 14:01
    Joined on 24/03/2006
    Posts 29,249
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-10802193
  • Offline
    6
    Posted by: clumsy1974 29/07/2010 at 14:01
    Joined on 13/01/2010
    Posts 444

    Why does everything Gove does have to be done at speed? If kids are on a program of study they can't be wrenched off it onto a new one - so changing the curriculum can be a considered and careful activity without really harming anyone. If a school wants to change it's status, and is already doing well as it is, what's going to be harmed if some time and planning are put into the change?

    My Grandad always gave good advice, and two bits come to mind here - measure twice, cut once.. and, if a job's worth doing, it's worth doing well..

  • Offline
    7
    Posted by: Middlemarch 29/07/2010 at 14:23
    Joined on 09/09/2005
    Posts 16,677

     Well, well, well - what an interesting list that is.  I know a couple of the heads of schools on it personally (though I've not seen them for a few years) and went and had a look at one of their websites.

    I was intrigued to find that this 'outstanding' school boasts an 'executive head', a 'head' and an 'associate head' - something you normally only find with schools in special measures where various bods are sent in to try to turn it around.  I wondered as I looked at it how much money was already being spent on their salaries alone and then a reason as to why they might want to get their hands on the amount the LA holds back came to me...

  • Offline
    8
    Posted by: clumsy1974 29/07/2010 at 14:33
    Joined on 13/01/2010
    Posts 444

    Yes.. there does seem to be a proliferation on heads. I have heard of an Assistant Head who is not even a qualified teacher, does not teach at all anyway, and is really more a business manager...

  • Offline
    9
    Posted by: curlygirly 29/07/2010 at 15:42
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 9,659
    Curioser and curioser...
  • Offline
    10
    Posted by: curlygirly 29/07/2010 at 15:50
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 9,659
    And not one school in my local authority is on the list, wahey!!!!
Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums