Forums

From FE to SE

Last post 30/01/12 at 07:09 by shirtandtie, 13 replies
Post started by rovermarc on 14/12/11 at 15:37

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    1
    Posted by: rovermarc 14/12/2011 at 15:37
    Joined on 03/03/2010
    Posts 7
    I've been teaching English Language in FE for 6 years, working in hospitals, airports, prisons, colleges and in the general community. I have a good English degree, a PGCE in the lifelong learning sector and a masters degree in modern and historical language studies. During this time I've seen many staff leave owing to cuts in funding, resulting in redundancies and the gradual erosion of terms and conditions for lecturers in the FE sector.
    I've complained for long enough about recent school-leavers who can't even construct a sentence or even know what an apostrophe is, so I've decided to become pro-active and to see for myself what is going on! I've already turned down one offer to work in an academy status secondary school this year but still hope to make the transition to another in the near future.

    Therefore, I have decided to try and make the transition from FE to secondary schools as I feel my subject qualifications are much more in tune with their requirements and the terms and conditions are much more favorable.
    FE lecturers may be concerned about the challenges of working with kids of this age but it's just a case of getting into a decent school with an efficient and disciplined management structure.

     

  • Offline
    2
    Posted by: Georgia99 20/12/2011 at 17:26
    Joined on 06/09/2010
    Posts 535

    As someone who has worked in both FE and Secondary, I would advise you to get some experience in a secondary school if you haven't already. No matter how good the school policies and management, behaviour will always be an issue.

    Noone can even try and explain to you the challenges of teaching a secondary level class and until you have experienced it first hand you will not understand this or know if you can cope.

    I wish you the best of luck but I do feel your comments are very naive and you seriously need to spend a good amount of time in a secondary school before you consider making the move or you will be in for a serious shock.

  • Offline
    3
    Posted by: rovermarc 22/12/2011 at 16:26
    Joined on 03/03/2010
    Posts 7

    Thank you for your response Georgia99. I agree that this will be a major culture shock and behaviour management will be an issue. If I sounded naive or blase about working in a secondary school then I'm probably belying my determination and enthusiasm to succeed at what I consider to be a massive challenge for me.

    I've had to deal with challenging behaviour from students who have recently left education and have barely been able to read. Surely not all students in secondary schools are like this! A close friend has just moved from school to another and claims the difference is unbelievable in the way she is supported with the school having a strict ethos.  

    Yes, I think this is a very pressured environment but I think these lie chiefly with achieving specific targets more than behavioural issues.   

  • Offline
    4
    Posted by: BillyBobJoe 22/12/2011 at 16:43
    Joined on 24/02/2006
    Posts 734

    I'm afraid I'm going to have to echo Georgia99. Behaviour in secondary schools is a massive issue, outside a small number of highly selective and/or oversubscribed schools. Compulsion makes a massive difference. In college if a student is annoyed they can walk out of your lesson. They'll be chased up, but no biggie. If they walk out of a lesson in school they'll be pursued by SLT or heads of year and corraled back, due to safeguarding fears. They know this, so discontent is voiced as disruption in the classroom. You may be thinking that your enthusiasm and inspiration will overcome this. Yes, it helps, but no amount of brilliant teaching can stop disruption - you can't please all of the people all of the time. And you will face students who actively loathe your subject and loathe you because of it.

    Even if 3 students out of a class are actively disrputive it's pretty much impossible to teach. It doesn't have to be all of them. Mainstream secondary is tough, and requires a totally different skill set from FE.

  • Offline
    5
    Posted by: olasma 28/12/2011 at 13:45
    Joined on 30/10/2011
    Posts 1

    Hi Rovermarc

    First of all I would like to congratulate you for making this decision and wish you the very best of luck in your endevours. 

    I am an FE lecturer. I passed my PGCE FE years ago and would like to do the same transition as yourself. However, I would need to do an other PGCE SE or a QTS. Any help at all on this i.e. how to obtain one or how to become a QTS and will it be Governement funded.

    Any help would be very much apprecited

    Kind regards

    Olasma

  • Offline
    6
    Posted by: rovermarc 28/12/2011 at 21:24
    Joined on 03/03/2010
    Posts 7

     

    Thank you Olasma!

    Firstly, if you've been teaching before 2007, QTLS is not considered as mandatory with FE's professional body, the IfL. Therefore, depending on the discretion of any prospective employer, you may not need QTS let alone do another PGCE - heaven forbid!.

    Modern thinking academies and the results of Wolf's proposal where Michael Grove claimed staff with qualified teacher learning and skills in FE should be able to work in schools, contributes to what I feel will become an increasing trend of FE lecturers making the transition into compulsory education. I turned down a contract earlier this year to work in an English Dept at a local school academy. Nothing clever about that but it does demonstrate that jobs are available to FE lecturers in this sector without necessarily having to take further qualifications.   

    Let us not underestimate the differentiation between teaching in FE and compulsory education but also let's not overlook the similarities either, which, let's face it, are far more prevalent. Most of my teacher friends are in the compulsory sector and obviously we talk about teaching when we meet. It's sad, but that's what teachers (compulsory or not) tend to do!  I digress, but the PGCE for lifelong learning and the PGCE for compulsory education is not exactly a model of polar opposites and I would argue it has 90% of its content and learning outcomes are virtually replicated.

  • Offline
    7
    Posted by: Georgia99 01/01/2012 at 17:33
    Joined on 06/09/2010
    Posts 535

    Hi, at my secondary school there are three teachers who are PGCE FE trained who teach on the Construction, Hairdressing and Dance courses. They are all paid on the main teaching scale.

    I know quite a lot of people who have made the move and the school may support you to gain QTS, this includes collecting evidence for Q standards and completing Maths, ICT and English tests. You would not need to do another PGCE though.

    The PGCE in both compulsory and lifelong learning are equal qualifications. The difference with the compulsory PGCE is that you have to achieve QTS alongside this in order to work in secondary schools. (Although as noted above, schools are increasingly taking non QTS candidates particularly for vocational courses). One key issue is that there is a surplus of secondary school teachers competing for jobs and this makes it difficult for a FE qualified candidate to even be shortlisted for a non vocational subject. But I believe that FE qualified teachers more commonly have a better knowledge and experience of their field as they are often ex professionals in these sectors and I think schools are starting to acknowledge this.

    The main areas that FE teachers seem to need support is behaviour management and afl. In my experience most FE teachers seem to know very little about afl and this is really important to understand in schools.

    I would love to gain a lecturing post in FE, I personally find it far less stressful. But everyone is different. Sorry if my last post sounded harsh, I didn't intend it to. I don't want people to make the same mistake as me and leave a FE job to go to a secondary school because of the better contract, conditions etc before really understanding the challenges of independently leading a class of compulsory school age kids!! It is tough and stressful and I work in one of the better schools in my area.

  • Offline
    8
    Posted by: Ska83gbr 07/01/2012 at 21:58
    Joined on 19/01/2010
    Posts 175

    How on earth can an FE lecturer assess a student's attainment or potential with no knowledge of AFL? I'm assuming this TLA stands for Assessment For Learning??? Smile

    Secondary School really is not the bed of roses it is made out to be. I have lucked out and work in an amazing FE College where I am earning considerably more than ANY secondary school (public and private) in the surrounding area.

    I hate secondary school. It is just as regimented for the staff as it is the students. Maybe this is down to my laid-back attitude but I would much rather get involved with the topic material rather than spending half my lessons getting the kids to sit still and stop chucking things at each other. I experienced Secondary School on my PGCE Course (2 terms school placement, 1 term FE) and it really did remind me why I didn't want to teach that age range. To boot it was  Roman Catholic Private School (sigh)... 

    FE (as it currently stands) means all students HAVE to elect to be there and HAVE to choose my subject... given that I am firm believer in motivation and desire being the ONLY catalyst to successful learning, I am extremely happy here. :) If my students' behaviour isn't directly impacting their, or anyone else's learning, I really don't care. Screw the rules. I am not getting called up by my HoD, asking me why I didn't tell Steve to tuck his shirt in. Christ. Sod that. 

    Maybe this is a reson why I have never experienced any challenging behaviour? I treat my students as adults, with respect, and it comes back tenfold. 

    :)

  • Offline
    9
    Posted by: rovermarc 11/01/2012 at 00:15
    Joined on 03/03/2010
    Posts 7

    Firstly, since when was secondary school teaching ever made out to be a bed of roses! I know enough teachers to have discovered that the opposite is true. Secondly, if I need to develop my Assessment for Learning skills I don't see it as a huge problem. We are all encouraged to have a flexible 'can-do' approach in the modern world.

    Our FE college relies on funding and we are simply not getting the classes like we used to when we were funded by the LSC. I took a class last week which consisted of students from the employment exchange and their only motivation to attend was that they didn't get their money if they failed to show. I always treat my students with respect and as adults and some were fine but the younger ones were totally disruptive and refused to work and insulted the ones who did and I now have a racist incident to deal with! I never had this trouble when I worked at a prison!

    We often deal with students who have just left school and came away with next to nothing and are forced into English and maths courses, just as they are in prisons. Their attitude is no different post compulsory as to what it was at school. In fact it's worse because they know they can get away with more. When I refuse to sign their EMA forms for their money I get irate parents complaining and a management that are pressured into supporting the parents instead of the teacher. Certainly no bed of roses either! At least in schools you get some kids who actually want to learn!

    Teaching is tough today whatever you do. But if we don't face up to challenges then we should be doing something else! 

  • Offline
    10
    Posted by: yemioba 26/01/2012 at 10:51
    Joined on 02/08/2010
    Posts 1

    th

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums