TESthink, educate, share

Covering for member of staff on a residential trip - primary school

Avatar

TES Pay and conditions - Forum

For discussion on teacher pay and conditions join the TES Pay and Conditions group. You’ll find chat and advice on pay scales, TLRs, threshold pay, Golden Hellos, pensions, retirement and much more.

Members 3244 Total Posts 16756

Covering for member of staff on a residential trip - primary school

  • post reply
    A yr 3 teacher is accompanying children from yr 6 on a week's residential trip. The trip was planned over a year ago. This teacher's expertise and first aid training makes them the most suitable person to accompany the children, the deputy head will also be away on the trip. As there will be about a quarter less Year 6 children in school during the week of the trip our head has said that one of the yr 6 teachers must move to yr 3 for the week to cover for the absent teacher. This will leave two yr 6 teachers in charge of 70 children. I know that there is no cap on the number of KS2 children that a teacher can have in a class and we do have quite large classes anyway. However, can the head legitimately ask one of the yr 6 teachers to move to yr 3 for a week to cover for the absent teacher, leaving their own class to be split amongst the 2 remaining teachers? We have been told there is no money in the school budget to cover the cost of a supply teacher. Thanks
    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply

    snowyhead
    can the head legitimately ask one of the yr 6 teachers to move to yr 3 for a week to cover for the absent teacher, leaving their own class to be split amongst the 2 remaining teachers?

    There are 2 issues here.

    Yes, the head can deploy their staff any way they wish within reason.

    Don't forget however that having children from a split class in your class (even 1 child) actually counts as cover and should be added to the total hours. I suppose 1 week out of the year might count as 'rarely'.

    In the interests of school harmony you might want to work with the head and perhaps suggest that the week be written off for the year 6 children and have them split throughout the school to act as helpers with younger children rather than overloading just 2 teachers?

    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply
    Thank you for your response. Could you clarify the point you make: 'Yes, the head can deploy their staff any way they wish within reason'. Does that mean that 'rarely cover' should, in theory, never be an issue? If a head can deploy staff as they see fit across a school then a teacher can never be deemed to be 'covering' if they can be deployed in different year groups/departments at the head's direction. Surely, 'within reason' is open to interpretation, to fit whatever situation a head teacher decrees. Our working week is 37.5 hours, I'm not sure I consider covering for a missing colleague for a whole week as 'rarely'. Even under the pre-2009 conditions of service the maximum cover was 38 hours per academic year.
    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply
    Possibly, it would also depend upon your contracts. Is your job title as class teacher or year 6 teacher. Though I think you'd probably have a huge fight for the sake of a few days.
    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply

    becktonboy

    the head can deploy their staff any way they wish within reason.

    There is a national agreement in place that states that staff should not cover for planned absences.  The fact that this has been planned for a year doesn't make it an emergency.

    Having rights is one thing - enforcing them is another, so check with your union - local or regional office if no school rep

    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply

    snowyhead
    The trip was planned over a year ago.... We have been told there is no money in the school budget to cover the cost of a supply teacher. Thanks

    To quote from STPCD "Since 1st September 2009, all schools in England and Wales have been required to have in place robust policies and procedures to ensure that teachers and headteachers cover only rarely in unforeseeable circumstances... A robust system would be expected to deal with all foreseeable events"

    As the agreement was signed by the Secretary of State for education, your head has no right to vary it unilaterally - and pleading poverty does not legitimise non-compliance.

    See http://www.nasuwt.org.uk/system/search/index.htm?search=rarely+cover&stype=QUICK for more information - NASUWT but citing nationally agreed documents

     


    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply
  • post reply

    A school can amend the timetable (even on a temp basis) for a period of time.  At my last school (a state school) the school calendar had temp timetable shading during schools trips etc, where staff would be expected to have the same amount of contact time and PPA etc as usual but it might be with different classes than usual.  (i.e. staff freed up from teahcing because their classes were away covered the classes of colleagues on a trip or took mixed up classes of leftover kids.

    Posted
    Please join this group to replyReply