Discuss professional development and the role of the chartered teacher in the TES Scotland Professional Development Group. Find out what forms of CPD other teachers recommend and discuss your career development options with your peers.
Russell to be handed plan for body to ‘raise professional development’
Chartered teachers have tabled a proposal they hope can fuse the best of their scheme with the aspirations of education secretary Michael Russell for an all-masters’ profession.
They propose an institute of chartered teachers - akin to those for architects, accountants and engineers - “aimed at raising professional development, collaboration and aspiration to a higher level than was possible under the existing chartered teacher scheme”.
The Association of Chartered Teachers Scotland (ACTS) even suggests that membership of the body could become a requirement for all promoted posts.
There was widespread consternation last year when the McCormac review of teacher employment recommended scrapping the chartered teacher scheme, but an ACTS statement on the proposed institute is more sanguine.
“The proposal will allow the cabinet secretary to say that he has accepted Professor McCormac’s recommendations while also taking on board the concerns of professional bodies, other academics and chartered teachers themselves,” it says.
“He can solve the local authorities’ issue of budgetary control of salaries and chartered-teacher numbers. He can retain the goodwill of existing chartered teachers and thereby ensure their continued commitment in raising standards in schools, raising expectations of our students and in the practical application of Curriculum for Excellence ideology.”
The McCormac review claimed that not all chartered teachers were having the impact they should. ACTS says all 1,385 teachers who had gained that status by December 2011 would have to apply for membership of the institute by providing evidence of meeting the national code of practice for chartered teachers, which would “tidy up” the register of chartered teachers. The 2,935 teachers part-way through the scheme could apply for membership upon completion of a master’s degree.
One option for funding those just starting their work toward chartered status could be local-authority money like that put into the Scottish Qualification for Headship, suggests ACTS.
The institute would eventually become self-funding through subscriptions and other sources, but it might need “moderate investment” from the Scottish government initially, it says.
ACTS considers it desirable to follow the example of other small countries, such as Finland, by encouraging experienced teachers to pursue professional development through an accredited, university-supervised course leading to a masters or equivalent award. In this, the association stresses, it shares the ambition of Mr Russell.
Mr Russell told TESS last month that chartered teachers and those en route to the qualification before entry to the programme was frozen last year are expected to be the “trailblazers” for a new master’s qualification.
Errrm can someone please explain to me what this would actually mean in practice.
I thought that by gaining CT status that CTs had already demonstrated their sheer dedication to duty and had already provided the evidence required.
McCormac's statement that CTs don't represent all of the best teachers could also be viewed that lots have slipped through the net. For a huge variety of reasons many very excellent teachers chose not to undertake CT studies. Will a rebranding and a required membership of an "insitute" encourage these people to undertake the enormous workload that CT entails along of course with producing CfE from multiple sets of conflicting draft documents?
I simply do not understand the need for an "institute" - membership of which would carry an(other) annual subscription and would do what exactly??
CT status is/was awarded by GTCS the very same people we trust to ensure that only suitably qualified people are allowed to teach in Scottish schools. There is a huge danger in any move away from this!!
Has ACTS consulted with its members on this proposal?
"ACTS says all 1,385 teachers who had gained that status by December 2011 would have to apply for membership of the institute by providing evidence of meeting the national code of practice for chartered teachers, which would “tidy up” the register of chartered teachers."
I agree wholeheartedly with Barbie. This article struck fear in me. Having been awarded Chartered Teacher status by the GTCS, am I to understand that another body can overide this? More jobs for the boys!
I don't need "tidied up" and GTCS holds the up to date register for CTs.
What is going on here?
HT approval has been needed for a while now and may I ask reduced rate of what?
Now is not the time to start driving a wedge between the GTCS route people and the programme people.
GTCS need to remain as the gateholders here.
Some of the GTCS route people opted for that route because they had existing Masters qualifications.
It can be argued that rather than racking up lots of Masters degrees, the obvious route would be PhD or EdD.
As to the Institute- why not embed this within the GTCS?
However given the leaks coming from negotiations that we are going to lose the money anyway- why should we even bother to fight?
I'm contemplating a career change- and Holyrood or Westminster will do nicely
barbiedoll59 HT approval has been needed for a while now and may I ask reduced rate of what?Now is not the time to start driving a wedge between the GTCS route people and the programme people.GTCS need to remain as the gateholders here.
Reduced rate of entrants.
Top of page
TES Editorial © 2012 TSL Education Ltd. All pages of the Website are
reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any material on the
Website for any commercial purposes. TSL Education Ltd Registered in England (No 02017289) at 26 Red Lion Square, London, WC1R 4HQ